CALIFORNIA SUGARBEET INDUSTRY
RESEARCH COMMITTEE
REQUEST FOR 2002 GRANT PROPOSALS
DUE: DECEMBER 20, 2001
OVERVIEW OF THE PROGRAM: The
California sugarbeet industry provides support for research focused on the
needs of the industry in California.
Funds come from an assessment based on sugarbeet production paid by both
growers and processors. Proposals are
reviewed for technical and scientific merit by a research advisory committee
consisting of university and USDA scientists.
Awards are made by a joint grower-processor review committee meeting
subsequently in conjunction with the sugarbeet industry's annual review of
funded research. Most projects are one
year in duration and awards have been made in the range of $2,000 to $30,000 in
the past. Awards are provided through
the California Beet Growers Association and are handled as unrestricted gifts,
so proposed budgets should not include overhead charges.
FORMAT: Proposals should be concise
(one to four pages long) and include:
1.
an introduction (justification),
2.
objectives,
3.
plans and procedures (methods), and
4.
budget.
Plans and procedures should clearly describe the methods
to be used (including background on any unusual or uncommon methods), and
clearly define experimental design. A
timetable or anticipated chronology for the work may be helpful. FIf the proposal is a request for renewal of an existing project or if
funds have been granted for a different project(s) in the previous year, a
project report should accompany the proposal. Successful
applicants also will be requested to report their results in January at the
annual sugarbeet research review.
INDUSTRY RESEARCH PRIORITIES: In 2001, sugarbeet production in
northern California ceased. Applied
research should focus on the San Joaquin and Imperial Valleys. There are several important problems
affecting sugarbeet production in these areas of California that the industry
regards as high priorities for research, but proposals do not need to be
limited only to these priorities. The
industry’s research priorities include:
1.
Beet army worm and leafhopper control
2.
The improvement of stand establishment
3.
Curly top management
4.
Sugarbeet root quality, particularly increased sugar percent
5.
Virus diseases, including rhizomania, the yellowing viruses, and curly
top
6.
Sugarbeet cyst nematode and root knot nematode, especially in the IV.
7.
Improved economic efficiency
A variety of
creative approaches is encouraged.
Because funds are limited, the industry would like to
encourage researchers to seek matching funds to supplement industry
support. To facilitate review and
evaluation, one copy of each proposal should be sent separately to both Ben
Goodwin and Stephen Kaffka by December 20, 2001.
|
Ben Goodwin California Beet Growers Association Two West Swain Road Stockton, CA 95207-4395 TEL: (209)-477-5596 FAX:
(209)-477-1610 E-MAIL: cbga@cwnet.com |
Stephen Kaffka Department of Agronomy & Range Science University of California Davis, CA 95616-8515 TEL: (530)-752-8108 FAX:
(530)-752-4361 E-MAIL: srkaffka@ucdavis.edu |
C:\Work\WORK\Sugarbeet\CBGA\CBGA‑RFP(2001).wpd